Facebook sinking even deeper

• “Why I’m quitting Facebook” by Douglas Rushkoff (CNN; 2013.02.25) – http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/25/opinion/rushkoff-why-im-quitting-facebook/index.html?iid=article_sidebar
  • I have always argued for engaging with technology as conscious human beings and dispensing with technologies that take that agency away.

    Facebook is just such a technology. It does things on our behalf when we’re not even there. It actively misrepresents us to our friends, and worse misrepresents those who have befriended us to still others. To enable this dysfunctional situation — I call it “digiphrenia” — would be at the very least hypocritical.

  • Facebook does not exist to help us make friends, but to turn our network of connections, brand preferences and activities over time — our “social graphs” — into money for others.
  • The true end users of Facebook are the marketers who want to reach and influence us. They are Facebook’s paying customers; we are the product. And we are its workers. The countless hours that we — and the young, particularly — spend on our profiles are the unpaid labor on which Facebook justifies its stock valuation.
• “Facebook Is Recycling Your Likes To Promote Stories You’ve Never Seen To All Your Friends” by Anthony Wing Kosner (Forbes; 2013.01.21) – http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/01/21/facebook-is-recycling-your-likes-to-promote-stories-youve-never-seen-to-all-your-friends/
• “Why are dead people liking stuff on Facebook?” by Bernard Meisler (ReadWrite > Social; 2012.12.11) – http://readwrite.com/2012/12/11/why-are-dead-people-liking-stuff-on-facebook

New Facebook machinations

• Facebook Privacy section at EPIC (Electronic Privacy Information Center) – http://epic.org/privacy/facebook/
  • Facebook and the Facial Identification of Users – http://epic.org/privacy/facebook/facebook_and_facial_recognitio.html
• “Facebook to alter privacy practices following FTC ruling” by Greg Masters (SC Magazine; 2011.11.29) – http://www.scmagazineus.com/facebook-to-alter-privacy-practices-following-ftc-ruling/article/217775/
  • Users were deceived by Facebook, and now the social media giant is paying the price.
  • “Facebook is obligated to keep the promises about privacy that it makes to its hundreds of millions of users,” Jon Leibowitz, chairman of the FTC, said in a statement. “Facebook’s innovation does not have to come at the expense of consumer privacy.”
  • The FTC charges chronicle a number of misleading or untrue assertions about privacy that Facebook made, but did not keep, including: not warning users when a change to its “Friend List” allowed private information to be exposed; stating that third-party apps would not access personal information beyond what they needed to operate; claiming that the “Verified Apps” program certified the security of participating apps; promising users it would not share personal data with advertisers; and insisting that it complied with the U.S.-European Union Safe Harbor Framework that governs data transfer between the United States and certain European nations.
• “Facebook Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers By Failing To Keep Privacy Promises” (FTC; 2011.11.29) – http://ftc.gov/opa/2011/11/privacysettlement.shtm
  • In December 2009, Facebook changed its website so certain information that users may have designated as private – such as their Friends List – was made public. They didn’t warn users that this change was coming, or get their approval in advance.
  • Facebook represented that third-party apps that users’ installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly all of users’ personal data – data the apps didn’t need.
  • Facebook told users they could restrict sharing of data to limited audiences – for example with “Friends Only.” In fact, selecting “Friends Only” did not prevent their information from being shared with third-party applications their friends used.
  • Facebook had a “Verified Apps” program & claimed it certified the security of participating apps. It didn’t.
  • Facebook promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers. It did.
  • Facebook claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had deactivated or deleted their accounts.
  • Facebook claimed that it complied with the U.S.- EU Safe Harbor Framework that governs data transfer between the U.S. and the European Union. It didn’t.
• “24 year old student lights match: Europe versus Facebook” by Kim Cameron (Identity Weblog; 2011.10.13) – http://www.identityblog.com/?p=1201/li>
• Europe vs Facebook – http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/en.html
  • Facebook’s Data Pool – http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Data_Pool/data_pool.html#Target
  • europe-v-facebook.org YouTube channel – http://www.youtube.com/user/europevfacebook#p/c/8ED10AB2E76CD62E
• “Facebook Ireland accused of creating ‘shadow profiles’ on users, nonusers” by Laura Locke (CNet; 2011.10.21) – http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20123919-93/facebook-ireland-accused-of-creating-shadow-profiles-on-users-nonusers/
• “Facebook Patent to Track Users Even When They are Not Logged In to Facebook” by Bruce Scheier (2011.10.24)- http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2011/10/facebook_patent.html

---

Related here: Facebook privacy? What Facebook privacy? – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/facebook-privacy-what-facebook-privacy/ | Facebook foolies – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/facebook-foolies/ | Unending stream of Facebook privacy news – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/unending-stream-of-facebook-privacy-news/ | More Facebook news – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/more-facebook-news/ | Facebook monkeying again with user trust model – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/facebook-monkeying-again-with-user-trust-model/ | Scan for your Facebook privacy – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/i-want-you-to-scan-for-facebook-privacy/ | Facebook leaks users IDs to advertisers – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/facebook-leaks-user-ids-to-advertisers/ | Facebook mulls U-turn on privacy – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/05/19/facebook-mulls-u-turn-on-privacy/ | Mark Zuckerberg’s birthday present: Facebook in crisis – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/05/16/mark-zuckerbergs-birthday-present-facebook-in-crisis/ | Temptest in a teapot – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/05/15/1202/

Reputation management

• Vanish – self-destructing digital data – http://vanish.cs.washington.edu/
• FaceCloak – Protect user privacy on Facebook – http://crysp.uwaterloo.ca/software/facecloak/index.html – FaceCloak is an architecture for protecting user privacy on social networking sites, as introduced in the following paper:
  • Luo, W., Xie, Q., and Hengartner, U., FaceCloak: An Architecture for User Privacy on Social Networking Sites. Proc. of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT-09), Vancouver, BC, August 2009, pp. 26-33. – http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~uhengart/publications/passat09.pdf
• Reputation.com – online reputation management – http://www.reputation.com/
• uProtect –

Infosec pages at this blog

Related content at this blog:

• Infosec online – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/infosec-online/
• Infosec blogs – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/infosec-blogs/
• Infosec wikies – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/infosec-wikies/
• Infosec books – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/infosec-books/
• InfoSec lists and newsgroups – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/infosec-man-lists-and-newsgroups/
• Cloud security – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/cloud-security/
• “Book: Enterprise Security For the Executive” – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/book-enterprise-security-for-the-executive/

Steganography

• “New Tool Hides Data In Plain Sight On HDDs” (SlashDot; 2011.04.25) – http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/04/25/1558237/New-Tool-Hides-Data-In-Plain-Sight-On-HDDs
  “A group of researchers has developed a new application that can hide sensitive data on a hard drive without encrypting it or leaving any obvious signs that the data is present. The new steganography system relies on the old principle of hiding valuables in plain sight. Developed by a group of academic researchers in the US and Pakistan, the system can be used to embed secret data in existing structures on a given HDD by taking advantage of the way file systems are designed and implemented. The software does this by breaking a file to be hidden into a number of fragments and placing the individual pieces in clusters scattered around the hard drive.”
  • “Researchers Propose New Steganography System for Hiding Data” by Dennis Fisher (Threat Post)- https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/researchers-propose-new-steganography-system-hiding-data-042511
    • “Designing a cluster-based covert channel to evade disk investigation and forensic” by Hassan Khana, Mobin Javedb, Syed Ali Khayamb and Fauzan Mirzab – http://www.sciencedirect.com/

Geolocation

• “SimpleGeo Makes Location Data Free, Complicates Smartphone Tracking Worries” by Kit Eaton (Fast Company; 2011.04.22) – http://www.fastcompany.com/1749262/simplegeo-makes-location-data-free-complicates-smartphone-tracking-worries
• “Involuntary Geolocation To Within One Kilometer” 9SlashDot; 2011.04.08) – http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/04/08/1245244/Involuntary-Geolocation-To-Within-One-Kilometer
  Schneier’s blog tips an article about research into geolocation that can track down a computer’s location from its IP address to within 690 meters on average without voluntary disclosure from the target. Quoting: “The first stage measures the time it takes to send a data packet to the target and converts it into a distance – a common geolocation technique that narrows the target’s possible location to a radius of around 200 kilometers. Wang and colleagues then send data packets to the known Google Maps landmark servers in this large area to find which routers they pass through. When a landmark machine and the target computer have shared a router, the researchers can compare how long a packet takes to reach each machine from the router; converted into an estimate of distance, this time difference narrows the search down further. ‘We shrink the size of the area where the target potentially is,’ explains Wang. Finally, they repeat the landmark search at this more fine-grained level: comparing delay times once more, they establish which landmark server is closest to the target.”
• “Internet probe can track you down to within 690 metres” by Jacob Aron(NewScientist; 2011.04.05) – http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20336-internet-probe-can-track-you-down-to-within-690-metres.html
  Online adverts could soon start stalking you. A new way of working out where you are by looking at your internet connection could pin down your current location to within a few hundred metres.
• “Pinpointing a Computer to Within 690 Meters” by Bruce Schneier (2011.04.08) – http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2011/04/pinpointing_a_c.html

---

Related here:

• iPhone (and Androids, too) doing surveilance, on whose behalf? – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/iphone-doing-surveilance-on-whose-behalf/:
  • packetlss – Android location service cache dumper – https://github.com/packetlss/android-locdump
  • iPhone Tracker – http://petewarden.github.com/iPhoneTracker/

Privacy articles

• Report: “Dispelling the Myths Surrounding De-identification” (Anonymization can still work) by Lauren Weinstein (Lauren Buzz; 2011.06.16) – http://bit.ly/lbH5PE by Information and Privacy Commissioner of Canada [PDF]
  “Recently, the value of de-identification of personal information as a tool to protect privacy has come into question. Repeated claims have been made regarding the ease of re-identification. We consider this to be most unfortunate because it leaves the mistaken impression that there is no point in attempting to de-identify personal information, especially in cases where de-identified information would be sufficient for subsequent use, as in the case of health research. The goal of this paper is to dispel this myth – the fear of re-identification is greatly overblown. As long as proper de-identification techniques, combined with re-identification risk measurement procedures, are used, de-identification remains a crucial tool in the protection of privacy.”
• AOL search data scandal (WikiPedia) – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_search_data_scandal
• “What the know” series of articles (The Wall Street Journal) – http://online.wsj.com/public/page/what-they-know-digital-privacy.html
• “The privacy covenant is an illusion: How to regain control” by Chad Perrin (Tech Republic; 2011.04.18) – http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/security/the-privacy-covenant-is-an-illusion-how-to-regain-control/5351?tag=nl.e036

---

Related pages here: Privacy and digital liberties – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/privacy-and-digital-liberties/|Personal computer security – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/personal-computer-security/ | Online privacy tools – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/12/25/online-privacy-tools/ | Unending stream of Facebook privacy news – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/unending-stream-of-facebook-privacy-news/ | TSA folies – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/tsa-folies/

Declawing Cookies

• “Flash to Offer More Control Over Cookies” by Keir Thomas (PCWorld; 2011.01.13) – http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/216681/flash_to_offer_more_control_over_cookies.html

---

Disabling Flash cookies (LSOs)

• 1) Go to http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html. You should see something like:
  

• 2) Disable the “Allow third-party Flash content to store data on your computer” check-box:
  
  Since you are here, disable also “Store common Flash components to reduce download toimes.”, too.

WikiLeaks 2010

• CableSearch – http://cablesearch.org/ – an attempt for an user friendly search engine of already published documents from Wikileaks.

On the leaks

• HBGary Email Viewer (at Anonleaks.ch) – http://hbgary.anonleaks.ch/greg_hbgary_com/
• “Leaked Emails: Anti-WikiLeaks Security Firm Targeted Journalists” by Neal Ungerleider (FastCompanyl 2011.02.16) – http://www.fastcompany.com/1728259/leaked-emails-anti-wikileaks-security-firm-targeted-journalists
  A cache of emails leaked by the Anonymous collective indicates dirty tricks were considered against Salon’s Glenn Greenwald; the New York Times’s Jennifer 8. Lee and The Guardian’s James Ball also appear to have been monitored–they’re part of a “sabotage” PowerPoint.
• “Firm targeting WikiLeaks cuts ties with HBGary – apologizes to reporter” by Steve Ragan – (The Tech Herald; 2011.02.11) – http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201106/6804/Firm-targeting-WikiLeaks-cuts-ties-with-HBGary-apologizes-to-reporter
• “A disturbing threat against one of our own” by Kerry Lauerman (Salon; 2011.02.11) – http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks/index.html
• “BofA denies connection to proactive tactics to silence WikiLeaks” By Byron Acohido (USA TODAY; TechnologyLive blog; 2011.02.11) – http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2011/02/bofa-denies-connection-to-proactive-tactics-to-silence-wikileaks/1
• “Disgraced security firm asked Bank of America to fund anti-Wikileaks/anti-Glenn Greenwald campaign” by Cory Doctorow (BoingBoing; 2010.02.10) – http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/10/disgraced-security-f.html
• “Get Glenn Greenwald!” by Jesse Walker (Reason; 2011.02.10) – http://reason.com/blog/2011/02/10/get-glenn-greenwald
• “Private Contractors Plan To Protect Bank Of America From WikiLeaks By ‘Neutralizing’ Glenn Greenwald, Others” by Jason Linkins (The Huffington Post; 2011.02.10) – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/10/wikileaks-glenn-greenwald-bofa-neutralizing_n_821510.html
• “Did Security Firms Pitch Bank Of America On Sabotaging WikiLeaks?” by Andy Greenberg (Forbed; 2011.02.09) – http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/02/09/did-security-firms-pitch-bank-of-america-on-sabotaging-wikileaks/
• “The leaked campaign to attack WikiLeaks and its supporters” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2011.02.11) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/02/11/campaigns
• “Get Greenwald” by Yglesias (2011.02.09) – http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/02/get-greenwald/
• “Leaked HBGary Documents Show Plan To Spread Wikileaks Propaganda For BofA… And ‘Attack’ Glenn Greenwald” – from the this-is-like-out-of-a-bad-movie dept (techDirt; 2011.02.09) – http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110209/22340513034/leaked-hbgary-documents-show-plan-to-spread-wikileaks-propaganda-bofa-attack-glenn-greenwald.shtml
• “Data intelligence firms proposed a systematic attack against WikiLeaks” (EmptyWheel; 2011.02.09) – http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/02/09/security-firms-pitching-bank-of-america-proposed-targeting-glenn-greenwald/
• “Tit for Tat and Hack for Hack” (Hullabaloo; 2011.02.09) – http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/tit-for-tat-and-hack-for-hack.html
• “Data intelligence firms proposed a systematic attack against WikiLeaks” by Steve Ragan (The Tech Herald; 2011.02.09) – http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201106/6798/Data-intelligence-firms-proposed-a-systematic-attack-against-WikiLeaks
• “Wiki Rehab” by Evgeny Morozov (The New Republic; 2011.01.07)- http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/81017/wikileaks-internet-pirate-party-save – How to save Julian Assange’s movement from itself.
• “WikiLeaks’ Assange Threatened Lawsuit Over Leaked Diplomatic Cables” by Kim Zetter (Wired; 2011.01.06) – http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/vf-wikieaks/
  Just weeks prior to unveiling a giant cache of leaked U.S. State Department cables, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange threatened to sue the Guardian newspaper in Britain over publication of the documents, […]
  After receiving the database of a quarter-million cables from Assange under embargo last August, the Guardian obtained a second copy of the database from a WikiLeaks insider without conditions — which led the newspaper to conclude it was no longer bound by a signed agreement with Assange that it wouldn’t publish the documents until he gave the go-ahead.
  Assange, suddenly faced with having lost control of documents that WikiLeaks itself had received from a source, asserted that he owned the information and had a financial interest in how and when it was released, the magazine reports.
• “Amazon Cloud Not Big Enough For Feds and WikiLeaks” (SlashDot; 2010.12.29) – http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/12/29/1815238/Amazon-Cloud-Not-Big-Enough-For-Feds-and-WikiLeaks
• “Why WikiLeaks Is Unlike the Pentagon Papers” 9NYTimes) – http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204527804576044020396601528.html – Everyone knows that Daniel Ellsberg leaked top-secret government documents about the Vietnam War. How many remember the ones he kept secret, or why?
  • “Why WikiLeaks Is Unlike the Pentagon Papers” (SlashDot; 2010.12.29) – http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/12/29/1417246/Why-WikiLeaks-Is-Unlike-the-Pentagon-Papers
• “Wired Responds In Manning Chat Log Controversy” (SlashDot; 2010.12.29) – http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/12/29/0644234/Wired-Responds-In-Manning-Chat-Log-Controversy
• “Wired’s refusal to release or comment on the Manning chat logs” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2010.12.29) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/29/wired_1/index.html
• “Response to Wired’s accusations” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2010.12.29) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/29/wired_response_1/index.html
• “Putting the Record Straight on the Lamo-Manning Chat Logs” by Evan Hansen and Kevin Poulsen (Wired; 2010.12.28) – http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/greenwald/ – belated attempted defense of Poulsen’s and Lamo’s conduct in disclosing Manning and attacking WikiLeaks
• “The worsening journalistic disgrace at Wired” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2010.12.27) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/27/wired/index.html
• “FDL Manning-WikiLeaks Key Articles Table” by Jane Hamsher (FDL Action; 2010.12.27) – http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/12/27/fdl-manning-wikileaks-key-articles-table/
• “The Nixonian henchmen of today: at the NYT” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2010.10.24) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/10/24/assange
• “The strange and consequential case of Bradley Manning, Adrian Lamo and WikiLeaks” by Glenn Greenwald (Salon; 2010.06.18) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/18/wikileaks
• “‘I Can’t Believe What I’m Confessing to You’: The Wikileaks Chats” by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter (Wired; 2010.06.10) – http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/wikileaks-chat/
• “Wikileaks site unfazed by arrest of US army ‘source'” by Jonathan Fildes (BBC News; 2010.06.08) – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10265430
• “U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe” by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter (Wired; 2010.06.06) – http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/
• “The war on WikiLeaks and why it matters” by Glenn Greenwald (The Tech Herald; 2010.03.27) – http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks

Contents of leaks

• “WikiLeaks: Panama’s leader pressured U.S. to help wiretap opponents” by Tim Lister (CNN; 2010.12.29) – http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/12/29/panama.wikileaks.wiretaps/
• “How WikiLeaks Just Set Back Democracy in Zimbabwe” (The Atlantic; 2010.12.28) – http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2010/12/how-wikileaks-just-set-back-democracy-in-zimbabwe/68598/

---

Related here: Information disclosure sites – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/information-disclosure-sites/ | ACTA – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/acta/ | Law vs Technology – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/law-vs-technology/

.

Online privacy – tools

Tools

• Ghostery – http://www.ghostery.com/ – a browser extension that detects the well known web bugs (beacons, advertising cookies, other trackers) and allows suppression of these. | Extension for FireFox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ghostery/ | Extension for Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mlomiejdfkolichcflejclcbmpeaniij | Ghostery news – http://news.ghostery.com/
• HTTPS Everywhere – http://www.eff.org/https-everywhere – EFF’s extension for FireFox that enforces use of HTTPS for all sites that allow such traffic.
• Disconnect – a Google Chrome privacy extension – http://www.disconnectere.com/ – A browser extension that stops major third parties and search engines from tracking the webpages you go to and searches you do | https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/jeoacafpbcihiomhlakheieifhpjdfeo
• Facebook Disconnect – a Google Chrome extension – https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ejpepffjfmamnambagiibghpglaidiec
• Google privacy center – http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacy/
• Gmail privacy tool – Summary of data stored with this account. – Summary of data stored with this account.
• AdBlock for Safari – http://safariadblock.com/
• AdBlock for Chrome – https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom
• TrackerBlock – https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/trackerblock/ – a FireFox extension
  Block companies from tracking you through cookies, and delete Flash cookies they may leave behind. This is the most effective way to choose DO NOT TRACK. Over 300,000 people have set their privacy preferences with privacychoice.org.
• Keep My Opt-Outs – https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hhnjdplhmcnkiecampfdgfjilccfpfoe – a Chrome extension
  Permanently opts your browser out of online ad personalization via cookies.
• IBA Opt-out – https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gbiekjoijknlhijdjbaadobpkdhmoebb – a Chrome extension
  Save your interest-based advertising opt-out preference permanently.
• Beef Taco (Targeted Advertising Cookie Opt-Out) – https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/beef-taco-targeted-advertising/ – a FireFox extension
  Sets permanent opt-out cookies to stop behavioral advertising for 100+ different advertising networks, including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, all members of the Network Advertising Initiative, and many other companies.
• BetterPrivacy – https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/
  Ever wondered why you are still tracked though you tried everything to prevent it?
  BetterPrivacy is a safeguard which protects from usually not deletable LSO’s on Google, YouTube, Ebay…
• TOR (T??? Onion Router) – http://www.torproject.org/
  • “Home Internet with Anonymity Built In” by Tom Simonite (Technology Review; 2010.12.22) – http://www.technologyreview.com/web/26981/

Articles

• Freedom Box:
  • Freedom Box Project – http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox
  • “Dreaming of a Snoop-Proof Net” by Tom Simonite (Technology Review; 2011.02.16) – http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/26404/
  • “A Decentralized Internet In The Freedom Box” (PSFK; 2011.02.18) – http://www.psfk.com/2011/02/a-decentralized-internet-in-the-freedom-box.html
  • “Freedom Box: Freeing the Internet one Server at a time” by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols (ZDNet; 2011.02.16) – http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/freedom-box-freeing-the-internet-one-server-at-a-time/698
• “Some Google employees defect, then rebel” by Mark Milian (CNN; 2010.12.24) – http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/12/24/ex.google.employees/
• The internet and the ‘end of privacy’ – http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2010/end.of.privacy/
• What They Know – http://blogs.wsj.com/wtk/
• “Keep My Opt-Outs Google Extension Worries AdSense Publishers” by Barry Schwartz (Search Engine Roundtable; 2011.01.25) – http://www.seroundtable.com/google-keep-my-opt-outs-12850.html

X-Ray Vans on US streets

It is time for tin-foil hats … and (tin-foil) whole-body uniforms.

• “Security Theater Creep: Full Strength X-Ray Body Scanners coming to Airports” by Steve Watson (Prisonplanet.com; 201.03.02)- http://imperialtwilight.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/security-theater-creep-full-strength-x-ray-body-scanners-coming-to-airports/
• “Mobile X-Ray Anti-Terrorist Van Disturbs Privacy Advocates” by Charles Tate (Internetbits; 2010.10.04) – http://www.internetbits.com/mobile-x-ray-anti-terrorist-van-disturbs-privacy-advocates/54175/
• “Full-Body Scan Technology Deployed In Street-Roving Vans” by Andy Greenberg (Forbes; 2010.08.24) – http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/08/24/full-body-scan-technology-deployed-in-street-roving-vans/
  

---

Related here: “Surveillance, wiretapping, tracking, etc.” – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/surveilance-wiretapping-etc/.

Unending stream of Facebook privacy news

• “Facebook Deals: Discounts You Can Use. The Cost: Your Privacy?” by Hans Villarica (2010.11.05) – http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/11/05/facebook-deals-discounts-you-can-use-the-cost-your-privacy/
• How You Can Allow Search Engines to Index Your Private Facebook Account (Bill Hartzer’s blog; 2010.11.03) – http://bhartzer.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/how-you-can-allow-search-engines-to-index-your-private-facebook-account/
• How You Can Download Your Private Info from Facebook (Bill Hartzer’s blog; 2010.10.28) – http://bhartzer.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/how-you-can-download-your-private-info-from-facebook/
  • How to Download Your Information from Facebook – http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/how-to-download-your-information-from-facebook/
• “The (Very) Unofficial Facebook Privacy Guide [DOWNLOAD]” by Justin Pot (MakeUseOf; 2010.10.25) – http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/download-unofficial-facebook-privacy-guide/
• A shill-sounding article defending Facebook’s privacy practices: “Three Reasons To Stop Demonizing Facebook And Mark Zuckerberg” by Augie Ray (Forester; 2010.10.25) – http://blogs.forrester.com/augie_ray/10-10-25-three_reasons_to_stop_demonizing_facebook_and_mark_zuckerberg
• “Who is more secure – Facebook or the botnets?” (ThreatSTOP; 2010.10.25) – http://threatstop.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/who-is-more-secure-facebook-or-the-botnets/
• “Not content to destroy your privacy, Facebook now messes with your friends’ too…” by Eric Olson (Cyber Crime, Security & Intelligence blog; 2010.10.06) – http://ericolsonblog.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/not-content-to-destroy-your-privacy-facebook-now-messes-with-your-friends-too/

Privacy and digital liberties

Organizations and sites

• EPIC (Electronic Privacy Information Center) – http://epic.org/
  • Facebook issues – http://epic.org/privacy/facebook/places/default.html
  • Facebook Places and Privacy – http://epic.org/privacy/facebook/places/default.html
• EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) – http://www.eff.org/
• Seth Finkelstein’s Home Site – http://sethf.com/
• Information and Privacy Commissioner of Canada – http://www.ipc.on.ca/english/Home-Page/

Blogs

• 33 Bits of Entropy – http://33bits.org/ – The End of Anonymous Data and what to do about it. | RSS – http://33bits.org/feed/
• Pr1vacy’s Blog – http://pr1vacy.wordpress.com/

---

Related pages here: Privacy articles – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/privacy/ | Personal computer security – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/personal-computer-security/ | Online privacy tools – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/12/25/online-privacy-tools/ | Unending stream of Facebook privacy news – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/unending-stream-of-facebook-privacy-news/ | TSA folies – https://eikonal.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/tsa-folies/

More Facebook news

2010.10.07:

• “Facebook Groups to offer users more control” by Charles Arthur (Guardian; 2010.10.07) – http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/07/facebook-groups
• “What do I need to know about the new Facebook groups?” (Guardian; 2010.10.07) – http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/pda/2010/oct/07/facebook-groups

2010.10.06:

• “Facebook Annouces New Groups and Download Information Feature” (TweakYourLife; 2010.10.06)- http://tweakyourlife.com/119/facebook-annouces-new-groups-and-download-information-feature/
• “Facebook Has Groups…Trying to be Exclusive Again” (TweakYourLife; 2010.10.06)- http://tweakyourlife.com/127/facebook-groups-trying-to-be-exclusive-again/
• “Is your private phone number on Facebook? Probably. And so are your friends'” – http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/oct/06/facebook-privacy-phone-numbers-upload
  Uploads from iPhones using the Facebook app will push all your contacts onto Facebook’s servers – where they’ll be matched against any and everyone
• “Enjoy the film. Then try Facebook’s real challenge: restoring your privacy” by Thimoty Garton Ash – http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/oct/06/enjoy-the-film-facebook-privacy-challenge
  New technologies allow firms and governments to crawl all over our private lives. They also empower us to fight back

Schneier’s taxonomy of data used in social networks

• “A Taxonomy of Social Networking Data” by Bruce Schneier (IEEE Security & Privacy; July/August 2010) – http://www.schneier.com/essay-322.html
  …
  • Service data is the data you give to a social networking site in order to use it. Such data might include your legal name, your age, and your credit-card number.
  • Disclosed data is what you post on your own pages: blog entries, photographs, messages, comments, and so on.
  • Entrusted data is what you post on other people’s pages. It’s basically the same stuff as disclosed data, but the difference is that you don’t have control over the data once you post it — another user does.
  • Incidental data is what other people post about you: a paragraph about you that someone else writes, a picture of you that someone else takes and posts. Again, it’s basically the same stuff as disclosed data, but the difference is that you don’t have control over it, and you didn’t create it in the first place.
  • Behavioral data is data the site collects about your habits by recording what you do and who you do it with. It might include games you play, topics you write about, news articles you access (and what that says about your political leanings), and so on.
  • Derived data is data about you that is derived from all the other data. For example, if 80 percent of your friends self-identify as gay, you’re likely gay yourself.

  …

I want you to scan for Facebook privacy

"I want you to scan for Facebook privacy"

• Securing your Facebook privacy settings – http://www.macworld.com/article/151437/2010/05/reclaimprivacy_facebook.html
  
• The bookmarklet the performs Facebook privacy settings checks – http://www.reclaimprivacy.org/

Facebook leaks users IDs to advertisers

“Facebook, MySpace Confront Privacy Loophole” (WSJ.com, 2010.05.21) – http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256701215465596.html

Facebook, MySpace and several other social-networking sites have been sending data to advertising companies that could be used to find consumers’ names and other personal details, despite promises they don’t share such information without consent.

… Most social networks haven’t bothered to obscure user names or ID numbers from their Web addresses, said Craig Wills, a professor of computer science at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, who has studied the issue.

The sites may have been breaching their own privacy policies as well as industry standards, which say sites shouldn’t share and … See Moreadvertisers shouldn’t collect personally identifiable information without users’ permission. Those policies have been put forward by advertising and Internet companies in arguments against the need for government regulation. …

… For most social-networking sites, the data identified the profile being viewed but not necessarily the person who clicked on the ad or link. But Facebook went further than other sites, in some cases signaling which user name or ID was clicking on the ad as well as the user name or ID of the page being viewed. By seeing what ads a user clicked on, an advertiser could tell something about a user’s interests. …

…”If you are looking at your profile page and you click on an ad, you are telling that advertiser who you are,”…

What Internet Knows About You

http://www.whattheinternetknowsaboutyou.com/

Facebook mulls U-turn on privacy

“Facebook mulls U-turn on privacy” (BBC News, 2010.05.19) – http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10125260.stm

Mark Zuckerberg’s birthday present: Facebook in crisis

“Mark Zuckerberg’s birthday present: Facebook in crisis” (The Daily Maverick, 2010.05.16) – http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za/article/2010-05-13-mark-zuckerbergs-birthday-present-facebook-in-crisis